All across the globe, small children spontaneously speak of previous lives, beg to be taken “home,” pine for mothers and husbands and mistresses from another life, and know things that there seems to be no normal way for them to know.
From the moment these children can talk, they speak of people and events from the past—not vague stories of centuries ago, but details of specific, identifiable individuals who may have died just months, weeks, or even hours before the birth of the child in question.
For 37 years, Dr. Ian Stevenson (pictured below) has traveled the world from Lebanon to suburban Virginia, investigating and documenting more than two thousand of these cases of past-life memory.
Tom Shroder is the only journalist who has had the privilege of accompanying Stevenson in his fieldwork. He followed Stevenson as he talked to dozens of children and families touched by this phenomenon.
So here’s the big question: Did working with Stevenson, and witnessing people talk compellingly about past lives, change you from skeptical journalist to true believer?
“I think that if you want to make a rational inquiry into something, you need to not worry about what you believe—it is what the facts demonstrate,” says Shroder, an author and award-winning writer, who was the former editor of The Miami Herald’s Sunday magazine, Tropic, and The Washington Post Magazine.
“Even if you go on to live another life, the odds are a billion to one that you won’t remember it, based on the very few people who do,” he believes. “Even those people who do remember past lives can only recall fragments of it.
“And if you go onto another life and have no memory of the previous one, you might as well not have had it, as far as I’m concerned. Except, I suppose, you could say that if you take the view as did some of the Druze in Lebanon, all of your lives are a sort of school in which you are developing and learning to become your true self, so to speak. If you don’t remember your past lives, I suppose you are not very far along in the process.”
That’s where Shroder’s insights into Stevenson’s work begins — and their work is exactly the reason we wanted to make his book, “Old Souls” our April 2013 Book of the Month.
We sat down with him in his home in Vienna, VA, to talk about “Old Souls,” the other books he’s penned—two that have been hits—as well as the new book project he’s working on, “Acid Test.”
- Click here to listen to our entire interview as a podcast on the Inkandescent Radio Network.
- Click here to read more of our interview with Shroder about his career, thoughts on the future of journalism, and suggestions for writers who want to break into the trade, in our Journalist of the Month column.
- And scroll down to read Shroder’s Prologue to “Old Souls,” which we think you’ll find as intriguing as we did. Whether or not you believe in past lives, this book will give you food for thought, and perhaps enlarge your perspective.
From “Old Souls,” by Tom Shroder
PROLOGUE: The Question
It is late, nearly lightless. Smoke from a million dung fires hangs in the headlights as the Maruti microbus bangs along the narrow, cratered hardpack that passes for a paved road in the Indian outback. We are still hours away from the hotel, an island of First World comfort in this simmering Third World ocean, and the possibility that we will never get there looms as large as the oncoming truck, absurdly overloaded and under-maintained, shuddering violently as it hurtles toward us dead in the middle of the road. Using every inch of the rutted dirt shoulder, we barely escape.
Through the thin tin of the Maruti, I can feel the truck vibrate, smell death in the exhaust pumping from its tailpipe. In escape, there is no relief. We bounce back onto the road’s pitted surface and immediately overtake a wooden cart lumbering to the heavy gait of yoked oxen with immense horns. Our driver leans on his horn as he swerves around the cart into a blind curve that I can only pray is not occupied by a bus loaded to the dented metal ceiling with humans and farm animals.
I try not to think about the lack of seat belts or the mere half inch of glass and metal that separates the front seat from whatever we plow into—or the “Lonely Planet” article I read that said fatal accidents were 40 times more likely on Indian roads than on American highways.
Or the account of a Western traveler who hired a car and driver in northern India, exactly as we have, only to crash head on into a truck, then regain consciousness in agony in a crude hospital, stripped of passport, money belt, and insurance papers. I try not to think about dying 10,000 miles from home, about never seeing my wife and children again, about their lives going on without any trace of me. I try not to think about absolute darkness.
But even within my bubble of fear, I am aware of the irony. Sitting in the backseat, apparently unconcerned about the two-ton mud-splattered torpedoes racing toward us, is a tall, white-haired man, nearly 80, who insists that he has compiled enough solid, empirical evidence to demonstrate that physical death is not necessarily the end of me or anyone else.
His name is Ian Stevenson, and he is a physician and psychiatrist who has been braving roads like this and worse for 37 years to bring back reports of young children who speak of remembering previous lives and provide detailed and accurate information about people who died before they were born, people they say they once were. While I struggle with my fear of dying, he is wrestling with his own fear of annihilation: that his life’s work will end, largely ignored by his peers.
“Why,” he asks for the third time since night has fallen, “do mainstream scientists refuse to accept the evidence we have for reincarnation?”
On this day, and for the past six months, Stevenson has shown me what he means by “evidence.” He has permitted me to accompany him on field trips, first to the hills surrounding Beirut and now on a wide swath of India. He has responded to my endless questions and even invited me to participate in the interviews that are the heart of his research.
The evidence his is referring to does not come from fashionable New Age sources, past-life readings, or hypnotic regressions during which subjects talk about being a Florentine bride in the 16th century or a soldier in the Napoleonic Wars, rendering the kind of details one might garner in an hour’s time paging through a few romance novels.
The details Stevenson’s children recall are far more homely and more specific than those. One remembers being a teenager called Sheila who was hit by a car crossing the road to collect grass for cattle feed, another recalls the life of a young man who died of tuberculosis asking for his brother, a third remembers being a woman waiting for her surgery in Virginia, trying and failing to call her daughter before the operation she would not survive.
It goes on and on: These children supply names of towns and relatives, occupations and relationships, attitudes and emotions that, in hundreds of cases around the world, are unique to a single dead individual, often apparently unknown to their present families. But the fact is, the people the children remember did exist, the memories that the children claim can be checked against real lives, and their alleged feats of identification verified—or contradicted—by a variety of witnesses.
This is what Stevenson has been doing for almost 40 years; it is what we have been doing in Lebanon and India: examining records, interviewing witnesses, and measuring the results against possible alternative explanations. I have seen close up, as few others have, how compelling some of these cases can be—and not only just factually, but in the emotion visible in the eyes and the voices of the subjects, their families, and the families of the people they claim to have been. I have seen and heard astonishing things, things for which I have no easy explanation.
Now we are near the end of our last trip together, perhaps the last trip of Stevenson’s career. It dawns on me in the noisy chill of the microbus, droning and rattling through the night, that Stevenson’s question is not rhetorical. He is asking me, the outsider, the skeptical journalist who has seen what he has to show, to explain. How can scientists, professed to hold no dogma that reasonable evidence cannot overturn, ignore the volumes of reasonable evidence that he has provided?
I begin to go into some long riff about how, in the absence of any knowledge about the mechanism of the transfer—the means by which personality, identity, and memory can be reassigned from one body to another—it is hard to talk about proof. But then I stop cold. I hear myself rambling, and realize what he is really asking: After all I have seen and heard, do I, at least, believe?
I, who have always felt mortality in my marrow, who have stared inward but never seen a ripple nor heard a whisper of any life but my own, who have seen people near to me disappear into death with an awesome and unappealable finality and learned in my flesh, where it counts, that the only thing abiding is an unyielding sense of diminishment. What do I think?
He wants to know. He is asking me. He deserves an answer.
Want to read more? Click here to buy Old Souls.